ITAR Freight Forwarders

When I was a kid, my father used to provide me with a wealth of important “life lessons,” doled out in simple one-liners that I could carry with me as I grew older. One of my favorites was “If you’re going to run with the pack, make sure you’re the leader.” Another that has served me well throughout life was “Always use the right tool for the job.”
The same can be said when it comes to choosing the correct freight forwarder to manage the transport of your ITAR controlled goods. It’s important that you use the right forwarder for the job. As the manufacturer or source of USML goods, you have undoubtedly spent countless hours developing your corporate compliance program; ensuring that every aspect of your operation – from upper management, to sales, to shipping and receiving – is aware of the regulations and well trained.
We all know, however, that your responsibility for those goods does not end there. Once your product leaves your dock, you are still responsible for the transport of those goods to the foreign consignee or end user. For this reason, it’s crucial to your compliance program to ensure that the forwarder you choose is also fully aware of the complex requirements of the ITAR.
Just as your organization undoubtedly interviewed and hired a corporate ECO (Export Compliance Officer), an interview process of sorts should be undertaken in order to choose your freight forwarder. Be sure to conduct this “interview” at their facility. After all, you go to great lengths to ensure that your building is secure – shouldn’t the first step be to ensure that your potential forwarder’s building is also secure? Be direct – ask to see what security measures are in place to protect your product. If a forwarder refuses to allow you to visit their facility, be very wary about moving forward with them unless they can provide a legitimate reason for refusal.
Once you are satisfied that your goods will be secure in the interim from your facility to the port or airport of departure, request to sit with the operational personnel who will be processing your shipments. Be very direct with your questions and take notes. These can be maintained in your records for due diligence purposes.

Here are some sample questions to get you started:

1. Are your operational personnel trained in the ITAR, and if so, where did they receive their training? How frequently do they receive this type of training?
2. Do you conduct in house training of this nature?
3. Do you have a copy of the ITAR on hand? (If they say yes, ask to see it and ensure that it is a current printing.)
4. What is the destination Control Statement for ITAR controlled goods, and why is it relevant to you – the forwarder? (This is a mistake I frequently see when auditing export documentation. 22 CFR 123.9(b) stipulates that the destination control statement must appear on both the invoice and the bill of lading. Most pre-printed bills of lading and air waybills are pre-printed with the Commerce Department’s EAR destination control statement. Therefore, If your forwarder is not physically placing the proper destination control statement on the transport document, you are in violation of 22 CFR 123.9 (b) – make sure they understand the difference between the two destination control statements.)
5. Do you have licensed customs brokers in house? (Although this may not be a “deal breaker,” having customs brokers on staff will make life much easier if you are dealing with DSP-73′s, DSP-61’s or repair items.)
6. Are you familiar with the most common licenses and what they represent? (They should be able to tell you the difference between a DSP-5, DSP-73, DSP-61, know what forms are used to amend those licenses, and know what must be lodged with CBP as opposed to requiring endorsement by CBP.
7. Are you familiar with the most common exemptions? (Repair exemption, tradeshow exemption, models & mock-ups, Canadian exemptions, etc) If you want to really test their knowledge, ask them this – “In what circumstance can I not use the repair exemption 22 CFR 123.4(a) (1)?” If they are well trained they will be able to tell you that if your goods are of foreign manufacture, and need to be returned to the US for repair, this exemption cannot be used.
8. In regards to 22 CFR 123.4(a) (1), ask them what the proper procedure is for utilizing this exemption. The freight forwarder plays a crucial role here, as the exemption must be noted on the entry document upon importation, and on exportation, both the exemption and the US Customs entry number must be indicated on the air waybill or bill of lading.
9. How do you determine whether or not something is SME (Significant Military Equipment)? A large number of exporters rely on their freight forwarder to process the EEI (Electronic Export Information) through AES (Automated Export System). Most forwarders will ask you to complete a shipper’s letter of instruction, which they utilize to complete the AES entry. The standard format of this form, however, does not have a block to indicate SME. If you are providing your freight forwarder with the proper category and sub-category for your item, i.e., Category XII (b), they should be able to tell you how they would come to the conclusion that this is indeed SME. As the AES specifically asks the question – “Is this Significant Military Equipment?” it’s crucial that they know how to determine this, and can demonstrate that to you.
10. What steps do you take to ensure that your partners overseas understand the implications of diversion? Another problem you face is making sure that everyone understands that your license is very specific. Intermediate consignees and end users (who are frequently unfamiliar with US regulations) often have more than one facility – perhaps an overflow warehouse or separate processing plant at a nearby location. Occasionally, the consignee will request that goods be delivered to such a facility. It is important that your freight forwarder takes the necessary precautions to ensure that their partners are aware that goods may only be delivered to the licensed address.
11. Will specific personnel be assigned to our account? Again – not a “deal breaker,” but we all feel more comfortable if we are working with the same people and not being bounced around from one person to the next.
12. What documentation do you normally provide to your exporters upon completion of a shipment? I am continually amazed by the number of exporters who tell me their freight forwarders do not provide them with copies of the AES transmission, bill of lading or air waybill, entry document, etc. Make sure they are willing and able to provide you with all the necessary documentation for your record-keeping responsibilities.
13. Have you handled ITAR goods in the past? If so, how long have you been handling goods of this nature? It’s important to get a sense of their experience. Everyone starts somewhere, but make sure they have some experience and are able to provide the service you need.
14. Can you provide references or letters of recommendation from other ITAR customers? This may be one of the most important questions you ask. If they are able to provide you with references, check them!
Once you have completed this grueling task of interviewing your potential freight forwarder, go through it a couple more times. Although most freight forwarders would love to be the only forwarder named on your license, (locking you into using their services) this ties your hands tremendously. Naming two or three freight forwarders on your license does not mean you have to utilize all of them. Use the one you are most comfortable with. However, having two or three freight forwarders named on your license will provide you with a built in “plan B,” in the event that something happens. Personnel changes happen. Mergers and acquisitions happen. What if you only have one forwarder listed on all your licenses and that forwarder is purchased by another company? If you are under contract delivery deadlines and suddenly have to stop shipping for a few weeks while you wait for amendments to be approved, the financial implications can be immense.
When you find a freight forwarder who meets your criteria, work hard to develop and maintain a solid relationship with them. They are your last defense and the final link in your export compliance program. It is important that you work together in a collaborative effort to sustain your goals. Remember – “Always use the right tool for the job.” Thanks Dad, I’ll keep that in mind…

About the Author:
As the Director of Compliance & Business Development at HNM Global Logistics, Deborah Dorsett is responsible for the areas of trade compliance, compliance consulting, internal compliance audits and performance reviews, employee training and niche industry marketing and business development. One of the founding members of HNM Global Logistics, Deborah brings with her an impressive 26 year career in the Transportation and Logistics industry. She has held management positions in warehousing, operations, logistics, trade compliance, marketing & business development with numerous manufacturers and logistics companies in the U.S. Dorsett’s core niche is within the defense industry, where she has played a key role in logistics and trade compliance with such companies as Boeing, NASA, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and DRS Technologies as well as program support for contracts with the U.S. Marine Corp., U.S. Army, U.S. Navy and various foreign Ministries of Defense.

Screening Process: What Lists to be Used for Screening?

Ensuring the end-user or recipient of the exported products, software and technical data is not listed in the denied and sanctioned party lists further increases the difficulty of doing business worldwide or disclosing a technical data or software source code to foreign persons. Companies and organizations can diminish the risk of violation of the export control regulations by running the name of persons and entities against the above mentioned lists and identifying the possible name matches prior to an export or a business activity. This practice is commonly called as the Denied/restricted party screening process.

Organizations generally assume that U.S. Department of Commerce issued lists are the only lists that need to be used to screen a trade partner. The truth is that those are only some of the lists that require attention. It is recommended that a risk analysis should be done to determine which lists are needed to be used. Type of the business transactions and geographical factors would impose consideration of several other lists. For instance, an organization exporting to or doing business in another country should likely include the denied party lists that are issued by that country’s respective agencies. Companies that are involved in specific business activities, such as government contracts, healthcare or financial activities, should also use the lists that are issued by the agency regulating those transactions.

Ukraine-related Designation : Addition of Seven Individuals to the OFAC SDN List

On June 20, 2014, U.S. Department of the Treasury announced an update to OFAC’s List of Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) and Blocked Persons. Update includes addition of seven individuals to the OFAC SDN List.
The U.S. Government expands sanctions against the pro-Russian separatists and emphasizes that further sanctions will be imposed if Russia will continue support/sponsor unrests in eastern territory of Ukraine. David S. Cohen, Under Secretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence noted that “Sanctioned individuals have all contributed to attempts to illegally undermine the legitimate government in Kyiv, notably by falsely proclaiming leadership positions and fomenting violent unrest.”
Four individuals were earlier sanctioned by either the EU or UK Governmental agencies. Bolotov, Girkin, Manyailo and Purgin were earlier added to the EU Sanction List whereas Ponomaryov, and all aforementioned individuals except Manyailo were added to the UK Treasury Consolidated List.

Companies and organizations should include these recently sanctioned and restricted parties into their export screening program.

The Lists of Individuals added to the OFAC SDN List as following:

BOLOTOV, Valery (a.k.a. BOLOTOV, Valeri; a.k.a. BOLOTOV, Valeriy); self-proclaimed governor of the separatist-controlled Luhansk region
GIRKIN, Igor Vsevolodovich (a.k.a. STRELKOV, Igor Ivanovich; a.k.a. STRELKOV, Ihor; a.k.a. STRELOK, Igor), – self-described “commander-in-chief of the Donetsk People’s Republic”
KAUROV, Valery Vladimirovich (a.k.a. KAUROV, Valerii Volodymyrovych; a.k.a. KAUROV, Valeriy; a.k.a. KAUROV, Valery); – self-proclaimed “president of Novorossiya”
MENYAILO, Sergei Ivanovich (a.k.a. MENYAILO, Sergei; a.k.a. MENYAILO, Sergey); – the de facto “acting governor” of Sevastopol
PONOMARYOV, Vyacheslav (a.k.a. PONOMAREV, Vyacheslav; a.k.a. PONOMARYOV, Vachislav); – a separatist leader
PURGIN, Andrey Yevgenyevich (a.k.a. PURGIN, Andrei; a.k.a. PURGIN, Andrej; a.k.a. PURGIN, Andriy; a.k.a. PURGYN, Andriy; a.k.a. PURHIN, Andriy) – self-proclaimed the co-head of a council running the separatist government in Donetsk
PUSHILIN, Denis (a.k.a. PUSHYLIN, Denis; a.k.a. PUSHYLIN, Denis Volodymyrovych; a.k.a. PUSHYLIN, Denys) – a leader of a group calling itself the “Donetsk People’s Republic,”

Removal of Seven entries and Addition of Two individuals and Nine entities to OFAC’S SDN List.

On April 29, 2014, U.S. Department of the Treasury announced on update to OFAC’s List of Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) and Blocked Persons. Update includes addition of two individuals and nine entities to the List as well as deletions of seven entries from the OFAC SDN List.

The following individuals have been added to the List:

AL AQILI, Mohamed Saeed (a.k.a. AL MARZOOQI, Mohamed Saeed Mohamed Al Aqili); DOB 23 Jul 1955; POB Dubai, United Arab Emirates; Additional Sanctions Information – Subject to Secondary Sanctions; Executive Order 13645 Determination – Material Support; Passport A2599829 (United Arab Emirates); National ID No. 784-1955-8497107-1; Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Al Aqili Group LLC (individual) [EO13645] (Linked To: NATIONAL IRANIAN OIL COMPANY; Linked To: ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS; Linked To: SEYYEDI, Seyed Nasser Mohammad; Linked To: KASB INTERNATIONAL LLC).

NIZAMI, Anwar Kamal; DOB 19 Apr 1980; citizen Pakistan; Additional Sanctions Information – Subject to Secondary Sanctions; Executive Order 13645 Determination – Material Support; Passport AE9855872 (Pakistan); Accounts Manager, First Furat Trading LLC (individual) [EO13645] (Linked To: KASB INTERNATIONAL LLC).

The following entities have been added to the List:

AL AQILI GROUP LLC (a.k.a. AL AQILI GROUP OF COMPANIES), Oud Metha Tower, 10th Floor, PO Box 1496, Dubai, United Arab Emirates; Website http://www.aqili.com; Email Address info@aqili.com; Additional Sanctions Information – Subject to Secondary Sanctions [EO13645].

DALIAN ZHENGHUA MAOYI YOUXIAN GONGSI (a.k.a. DALIAN ZENGHUA TRADING CO., LTD.), Dalian, China; Additional Sanctions Information – Subject to Secondary Sanctions [NPWMD] [IFSR].

DALIAN ZHONGCHUANG CHAR-WHITE CO., LTD., 2501-2508 Yuexiu Mansion, No. 82 Xinkai Road, Dalian, Liaoning Province 11601, China; Additional Sanctions Information – Subject to Secondary Sanctions [NPWMD] [IFSR].

KARAT INDUSTRY CO., LTD., No. 110 Baiyun Street, Dalian, Liaoning, China; Additional Sanctions Information – Subject to Secondary Sanctions [NPWMD] [IFSR].

MTTO INDUSTRY AND TRADE LIMITED, No. 9 Hongji Street, Xi Gang District, Dalian City, China; Additional Sanctions Information – Subject to Secondary Sanctions [NPWMD] [IFSR].

SINOTECH DALIAN CARBON AND GRAPHITE MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, Dalian, China; Additional Sanctions Information – Subject to Secondary Sanctions [NPWMD] [IFSR].

SINOTECH INDUSTRY CO., LTD., No. 190 Changjiang Road, Dalian City, China; Additional Sanctions Information – Subject to Secondary Sanctions [NPWMD] [IFSR].

SUCCESS MOVE LTD., No. 1109 Zhongshan Road, Dalian, China; Additional Sanctions Information – Subject to Secondary Sanctions [NPWMD] [IFSR].

TEREAL INDUSTRY AND TRADE LIMITED, No. 9 Hongji Street, Xi Gang District, Dalian City, China; Additional Sanctions Information – Subject to Secondary Sanctions [NPWMD] [IFSR].

The following deletions have been made on the List:

ABBAS, Kassim, Lerchesbergring 23A, D-60598, Frankfurt, Germany; DOB 07 Aug 1956; POB Baghdad, Iraq (individual) [IRAQ2].

BAY INDUSTRIES, INC., 10100 Santa Monica Boulevard, Santa Monica, CA [IRAQ2].

EUROMAC TRANSPORTI INTERNATIONAL SRL, Via Ampere 5, Monza 20052, Italy [IRAQ2].

EUROMAC, LTD, 4 Bishops Avenue, Northwood, Middlesex, United Kingdom [IRAQ2].

S.M.I. SEWING MACHINES ITALY S.P.A., Italy [IRAQ2].

LIBRA SHIPPING SA (a.k.a. LIBRA SHIPPING), 3, Xanthou Street, Glyfada 16674, Greece; Additional Sanctions Information – Subject to Secondary Sanctions [IRAN].

LIBRA SHIPPING (a.k.a. LIBRA SHIPPING SA), 3, Xanthou Street, Glyfada 16674, Greece; Additional Sanctions Information – Subject to Secondary Sanctions [IRAN].

About INTREDEX:

Intredex Trade Compliance assists companies with services such as
Restricted and Denied Party Screening
, Export Classification, ECCN, automated Export License Determination, online Export Control Regulations,
and with achieving the EAR (Export Administration Regulations) and ITAR
compliance with developing procedures for export transactions in alignment with the U.S. Government laws and regulations.